Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 614% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 510 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | R700 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 7 November 2008 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |