Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 260
In this comparison between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260 has 228% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
200−210
medium / 768p
110−120
170−180
ultra / 1080p
55−60
95−100
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
24−27
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 60% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
2−3
9−10
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
75−80
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
27−30
50−55
medium / 768p
18−20
30−35
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon R7 260
Architecture
Polaris
GCN 2.0
Code name
Polaris 12
Bonaire
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
21 March 2018
17 December 2013
Pipelines
512
768
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
39.01
48.00
Floating-point performance
1,248 gflops
1,536 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48 GB/s
104 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
DDMA audio
+
Check Price
Check Price