Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 A360
When choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 A360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 A360.
Radeon R7 A360
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 5997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Meso |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 23.52 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |