Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2018 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |