Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R9 370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 370
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 214% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |