Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 5996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 21 March 2018 | no data |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M