Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon R9 M375X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 M375X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon PRO WX 2100 stacks up against Radeon R9 M375X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 M375X
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M375X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M375X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Radeon R9 M375X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M375X in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2018 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | + |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |