Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon PRO WX 2100 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon PRO WX 2100 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon PRO WX 2100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 12 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 21 March 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |