FirePro S7000 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 438% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 43% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |