FirePro V5800 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 13% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 73% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 71% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
| Code name | Juniper | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |