FireStream 9250 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 130% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 211% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 129% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |