FireStream 9270 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon PRO WX 3100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 3100, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 146% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 2400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV770 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |