FireStream 9370 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 770M
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro 6000
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 770M
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Quadro 6000