GRID K140Q vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
When choosing between GRID K140Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K140Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100.
GRID K140Q
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 218% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |