GRID K260Q vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 3100, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |