GRID K280Q vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |