GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 800 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |