GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 3100, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 988 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 38% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |