Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
200−210
medium / 768p
85−90
170−180
ultra / 1080p
40−45
90−95
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
60−65
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
90−95
ultra / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
4K / 2160p
3−4
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 157% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
90−95
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 104% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 138% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
70−75
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
50−55
medium / 768p
12−14
30−35
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
100−105
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Polaris
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
21 March 2017
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
39.01
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
