NVS 510 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
When comparing NVS 510 and Radeon PRO WX 3100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 85% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
low / 768p
60−65
200−210
medium / 768p
27−30
170−180
ultra / 1080p
7−8
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
90−95
ultra / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
90−95
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 318% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
low / 768p
18−20
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
50−55
medium / 768p
−
30−35
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−105
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Radeon PRO WX 3100
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 12
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
21 March 2017
Pipelines
192
512
Core clock speed
797 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
39.01
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price