Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 3100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 66% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 666% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |