Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 130% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |