Quadro K2200M vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon PRO WX 3100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 3100, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 65 Watt.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 38% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |