Quadro T1000 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T1000 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon PRO WX 3100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Polaris |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1219 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |