Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon R5 M435
When choosing between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R5 M435, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon PRO WX 3100 and Radeon R5 M435.
Radeon R5 M435
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 193% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 166% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 466% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon PRO WX 3100 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 21 March 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |