FirePro W8000 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between FirePro W8000 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8000
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W8000 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
FirePro W8000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W8000 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 182 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.
FirePro W8000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
220−230
190−200
medium / 768p
190−200
160−170
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
QHD / 1440p
65−70
50−55
4K / 2160p
35−40
30−33
high / 768p
150−160
120−130
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
ultra / 1080p
70−75
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
110−120
90−95
medium / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
30−33
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
10−12
7−8
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
85−90
65−70
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
4−5
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
10−12
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
27−30
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
FirePro W8000
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Polaris
Code name
Tahiti
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
14 June 2012
26 September 2019
Pipelines
1792
640
Core clock speed
900 MHz
1082 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
41.44
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
176 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
391 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price