GeForce 820A vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 333% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 307 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GF117 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |