GeForce 920A vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920A and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920A and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 920A
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 96% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 128 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GK208B | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |