GeForce 930A vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When choosing between GeForce 930A and Radeon Pro WX 3200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 930A and Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce 930A
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 930A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 96% more power consumption, than GeForce 930A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 154 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce 930A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 930A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce 930A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 930A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM108 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |