GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 146% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 303 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GF114 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce MX250
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2