GeForce GTX 460M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M or Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 460M has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 268 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 460M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
190−200
medium / 768p
90−95
160−170
ultra / 1080p
45−50
85−90
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
ultra / 1080p
27−30
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
90−95
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
1−2
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
16−18
45−50
medium / 768p
10−12
27−30
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
N11E-GS
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 September 2010
26 September 2019
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
1350 MHz
1082 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
16.1 billion/sec
41.44
Floating-point performance
518.4 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
60.0 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API with Feature Level 12.1
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
33 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price