GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro WX 3200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 3200, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 106% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 102 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 5994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
210−220
190−200
medium / 768p
180−190
160−170
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
QHD / 1440p
60−65
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−33
high / 768p
150−160
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
ultra / 1080p
70−75
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
20−22
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
90−95
medium / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
10−11
7−8
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
80−85
65−70
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
10−11
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
27−30
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
26 September 2019
Pipelines
768
640
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1082 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
41.44
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
