GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M or Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 765M has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTX 765M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 232 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 765M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
190−200
medium / 768p
130−140
160−170
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
QHD / 1440p
40−45
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
70−75
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
10−12
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
90−95
medium / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
65−70
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−105
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
35−40
45−50
medium / 768p
21−24
27−30
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14-GE
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2013
26 September 2019
Pipelines
768
640
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1082 MHz
Boost Clock
863 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.23
41.44
Floating-point performance
1,326 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
