Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 682 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
8−9
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
35−40
21−24
ultra / 1080p
30−35
18−20
QHD / 1440p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
70−75
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
230−240
190−200
medium / 768p
200−210
160−170
ultra / 1080p
120−130
85−90
QHD / 1440p
100−110
50−55
4K / 2160p
55−60
30−33
high / 768p
170−180
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
55−60
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
medium / 768p
110−120
85−90
ultra / 1080p
85−90
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
20−22
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
5−6
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−33
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
35−40
21−24
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
130−140
90−95
medium / 1080p
75−80
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 51% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
35−40
21−24
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
QHD / 1440p
16−18
7−8
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
95−100
65−70
high / 1080p
45−50
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
QHD / 1440p
9−10
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−12
6−7
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−12
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
27−30
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−11
4K / 2160p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 72% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Polaris
Code name
Tiger Lake Xe
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 August 2020
26 September 2019
Pipelines
96
640
Core clock speed
400 MHz
1082 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
41.44
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
