Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K1000M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

    In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro K1000M Check Price
    Radeon Pro WX 3200 Check Price

    Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:

    Quadro K1000M Laptops
    Radeon Pro WX 3200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K1000M Radeon Pro WX 3200
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x8
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
    • Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
    • Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 232 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
    • Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 12−14
    ultra / 1080p − 7−8
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
    low / 720p 1−2 27−30
    medium / 1080p 0−1 16−18
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K1000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K1000M Radeon Pro WX 3200
    Architecture Kepler Polaris
    Code name N14P-Q1 Polaris 12
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 June 2012 26 September 2019
    Pipelines 192 640
    Core clock speed 850 MHz 1082 MHz
    Transistor count 1,270 million 2,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
    Texture fill rate 13.60 41.44
    Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 6000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 64 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.4
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 2.0
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 10 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares