Quadro K2200 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between Quadro K2200 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 4% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Quadro K2200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K2200 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K2200 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 36 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200.
Quadro K2200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
220−230
190−200
medium / 768p
190−200
160−170
ultra / 1080p
110−120
85−90
QHD / 1440p
75−80
50−55
4K / 2160p
40−45
30−33
high / 768p
160−170
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
ultra / 1080p
75−80
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
20−22
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
110−120
90−95
medium / 1080p
65−70
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
30−35
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
10−12
7−8
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
85−90
65−70
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
5−6
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
10−12
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
65−70
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
27−30
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
Quadro K2200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Maxwell
Polaris
Code name
GM107
Polaris 12
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 July 2014
26 September 2019
Pipelines
640
640
Core clock speed
1046 MHz
1082 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
44.96
41.44
Floating-point performance
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
