Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4770 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4770 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4770
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4770 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4770 has 23% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- Radeon HD 4770 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 4770 has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- Radeon HD 4770 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon HD 4770 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 332 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4770 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4770. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4770 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV740 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 April 2009 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops | |
Length | 203 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2