Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 7670A
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 44% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon HD 7670A is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 482 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Radeon HD 7670A is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7670A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 7670A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7670A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Turks | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2012 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 716 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |