Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 352 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 104% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 September 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |