Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R5 M435
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R5 M435, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro WX 3200 stacks up against Radeon R5 M435, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 M435
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 302 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 383% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 M435 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 153% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 466% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 September 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |