Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 357 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 26 September 2019 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics