Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 182 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 138% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Polaris | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 12 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 26 September 2019 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 22.56 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |