Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 M350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro WX 3200 stacks up against Radeon R7 M350, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M350
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 85% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 357 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M350 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 26 September 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Check Price |