Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 182 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 5996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 26 September 2019 | no data |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 37.00 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M