Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Tesla C2075
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 280% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 508 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
190−200
210−220
medium / 768p
160−170
190−200
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−105
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Polaris
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Polaris 12
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
26 September 2019
25 July 2011
Pipelines
640
448
Core clock speed
1082 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
41.44
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
