Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 49 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 800 MHz higher, than Tesla M10.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell |
Code name | Polaris 12 | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 26 September 2019 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |