FirePro S10000 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
When comparing FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro WX 4130, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S10000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 1 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1053 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |