FirePro W8100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon Pro WX 4130, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8100 stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 4130, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W8100
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 134% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Hawaii | Polaris |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |