GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro WX 4130 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 295 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 4130 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 6001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Battlefield 5 is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon Pro WX 4130 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |