GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4130 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 4130 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 5300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Pro WX 4130 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
| Code name | GF104 | Polaris |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |